Topic summary
⁠34%1 analyzed article/video1,010 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nyc Health results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Negativity Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 264 hits. Analysis detected 1,889 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,030 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (9,212 of 16,562 topics). This Nyc Health is better (less manipulative) than 55.60% of the peer group.
Nyc Health
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,030
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

44% percentile
025507510044.4% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.4%7.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 7.6%7.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 1.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.9%Middle Ground: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos