Topic summary
⁠19%5 analyzed articles/videos2,887 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Disease Prevention results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.7% saturation with 974 hits. Analysis detected 9,618 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,120 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠4% (14,914 of 15,447 topics). This Disease Prevention is better (less manipulative) than 96.50% of the peer group.
Disease Prevention
Topic details
Total words: 17,120
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

4% percentile
02550751003.5% percentile
1.3% BS Score5 analyzed articles17.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.7%5.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.8%1.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.7%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos