Speaker summary
53%8 analyzed articles/videos203.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Telegraph results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Availability Heuristic, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 30.7% saturation with 126 hits. Analysis detected 828.051 faulty-reasoning hits from 203.667 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 12.2% and a BS Rank of 17% (23,734 of 28,364 speakers). This The Telegraph is better (less manipulative) than 83.70% of the peer group.
The Telegraph

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

16% percentile
025507510016.3% percentile
12.2% BS Score8 analyzed videos203.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 21.9%21.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 30.7%30.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 19.9%19.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 8.8%8.8%Personal IncredulitySitewide 0.2%Speaker 6.8%6.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 14.4%14.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 6.8%6.8%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 6.8%6.8%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 7.5%7.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 21.7%21.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 30.7%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 21.7%, sitewide 26.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 21.9%, sitewide 1.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 19.9%, sitewide 9.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 6.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 5.3%Loss Aversion: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 2.5%Slippery Slope: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 0.8%Personal Incredulity: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 0.2%Primacy Effect: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate