Author summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,649 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Tanos results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 569 hits . Analysis detected 5,449 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,596 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 31% (4,394 of 6,359 authors). This Mark Tanos is better (less manipulative) than 69.10% of the peer group. Mark Tanos
Author details
Total words: 6,596
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.9% percentile 2.0% BS Score4 analyzed articles6.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.3% 8.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.5% 6.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.2% 3.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.4% 2.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 7.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst