Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Sophie Heawood results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Hasty Generalization , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.4% saturation with 670 hits . Analysis detected 4,799 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,286 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,350 authors). This Sophie Heawood is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Sophie Heawood
Author details
Total words: 3,286
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 15.3% 15.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 14.8% 14.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 7.7% 7.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.6% 4.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.6% 4.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 20.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Anecdotal: Author 15.3%, sitewide 5.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 14.8%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 10.4%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.1%, sitewide 5.3% Unattributed Quote: Author 7.7%, sitewide 1.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 7.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.5%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Author 4.6%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Composition/Division: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst