Author summary
β 73% 7 analyzed articles/videos 1,359 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bloomberg results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 1,345 hits . Analysis detected 9,409 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,199 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of β 45% (3,399 of 6,164 authors). This Bloomberg is better (less manipulative) than 55.10% of the peer group. Bloomberg
Author details
Total words: 9,199
Article count: 7
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
45% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 44.9% percentile 2.4% BS Score7 analyzed articles9.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0β50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 14.6% 14.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.7% 9.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.8% 1.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 14.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.7%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.3%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.2%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst