Author summary
⁠73%7 analyzed articles/videos1,359 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bloomberg results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 1,345 hits. Analysis detected 9,409 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,199 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (3,399 of 6,164 authors). This Bloomberg is better (less manipulative) than 55.10% of the peer group.
Bloomberg
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠45%Bloomberg (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 9,199
Article count: 7
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

45% percentile
025507510044.9% percentile
2.4% BS Score7 analyzed articles9.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.0%1.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 14.6%14.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.7%9.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.5%4.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.8%1.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.5%3.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 14.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 8.7%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.3%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.2%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos