Author summary
76% 1 analyzed article/video 898 analyzed words
BS Summary: These MARK BANCHEREAU Associated Press results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Pessimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.2% saturation with 437 hits . Analysis detected 1,616 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,694 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 63% (2,391 of 6,335 authors). This MARK BANCHEREAU Associated Press is worse (more manipulative) than 62.30% of the peer group. MARK BANCHEREAU Associated Press
Author details
Total words: 2,694
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 62.3% percentile 3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 10.5% 10.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.4% 1.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 16.2% 16.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 16.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Author 10.5%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.5% Red Herring: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst