Speaker summary
58% 12 analyzed articles/videos 680.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bill Essayli results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 23% saturation with 187.58 hits . Analysis detected 1,788.525 faulty-reasoning hits from 680.667 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.3% and a BS Rank of 8% (26,143 of 28,364 speakers). This Bill Essayli is better (less manipulative) than 92.20% of the peer group. Bill Essayli
Speaker details
Total words: 680.667
Article count: 12
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.8% percentile 8.3% BS Score12 analyzed videos680.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 16.4% 16.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 21.6% 21.6% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 10.3% 10.3% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 8.5% 8.5% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 9.8% 9.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 8.2% 8.2% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 8.3% 8.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 23.0% 23.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 1.5% 1.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 12.3% 12.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 16.4%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 23.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 21.6%, sitewide 11.1% Negativity Bias: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 8.1% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 1.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 1.4% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 9.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 0.0% Burden of Proof: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 0.4% Indoctrination: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 0.0% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 1.5% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Slippery Slope: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 1.7% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst