Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These MICHAEL BLOOD results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Confirmation Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 215 hits . Analysis detected 1,432 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,920 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This MICHAEL BLOOD is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. MICHAEL BLOOD
Author details
Total words: 2,920
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.0% 3.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.8% 0.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Primacy Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.9% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.3% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.1% Horn Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.8% Burden of Proof: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst