Author summary
0% 15 analyzed articles/videos 4,829 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jamie Paige results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 5,442 hits . Analysis detected 45,524 faulty-reasoning hits from 34,440 analyzed words across 15 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 46% (3,443 of 6,316 authors). This Jamie Paige is better (less manipulative) than 54.50% of the peer group. Jamie Paige
Author details
Total words: 34,440
Article count: 15
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
46% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 45.5% percentile 2.4% BS Score15 analyzed articles34.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 14.3% 14.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 12.4% 12.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.5% 9.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.8% 1.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 15.8% 15.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.7% 5.7% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 14.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 15.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.5%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 12.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst