Spencer Pratt cookie creator who was bullied by Jimmy Kimmel's sister gives incredible update 36%

By Jamie Paige0%

5/31/2026, 3:32:51 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Optimism Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 19.2% saturation with 89 hits. Analysis detected 643 faulty-reasoning hits from 464 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 42.8% and a BS Rank of 36% (14,185 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 64.80% of the article peer group.

The baker behind Los Angeles’ viral “Vote Pratt” cookies surprised Spencer Pratt at a campaign event Saturday with a personal thank you after her political cookie turned into a nationwide sensation. 
Daniela Romano, the baker behind the viral Spencer Pratt cookies that sparked a social media firestorm involving Jimmy Kimmel’s sister-in-law, told Pratt that orders are still flooding in from across the country weeks after the sweet controversy first exploded online. 
“You have gotten me so much business, it’s crazy,” Romano told Pratt. 
“I wanted to come and just give something back to you as well.” 
The cookies exploded online after a controversy erupted over their sale at a popular Brentwood grocery store. 
Allegations that Jimmy Kimmel’s sister-in-law Carly Kimmel objected to the store selling the pro-Pratt treats sparked a social media firestorm. 
Now, that attention is translating into orders from across the US. 
“We’re getting calls from all over the country,” Romano told The California Post. 
“I had someone call me from Canada today. 
I had someone call me from West Virginia, South Carolina, Florida. 
All over. 
Texas, a lot of Texas.” 
The demand has become so overwhelming that Romano is still working through how to ship cookies nationwide. 
“Oh, we’re talking like thousands,” she said of the requests. 
For Romano, the success carries special meaning. 
Romano lost both her home and bakery operation in the Palisades Fire. 
After spending decades building her business in Pacific Palisades, Romano is now rebuilding from a much smaller storefront with help from her brother and his baking team. 
The sudden surge in orders has given her business an unexpected boost during one of the most difficult chapters of her life. 
“It’s definitely opened up a whole new avenue of sales,” Romano said. 
“People actually know where I am now because they haven’t known where I’ve been.” 
At Saturday’s event, Romano told LA mayoral candidate Pratt she had become inspired by his campaign and his willingness to fight for local issues. 
“I worked in that town for 38 years from when I was 14,” Romano said, telling Pratt. 
“I saw you and I was like, I could have did something. 
Why didn’t I do anything? 
How come he’s working so hard? 
“You really impressed me,” she added. 
“I was like, look at him, he’s fighting for us, for our town.” 
Romano said the only challenge now is figuring out how to get the cookies to customers across the country. 
She is currently working through shipping requirements and expects to have nationwide orders rolling out soon. 
“People are not even worried about not getting them this week, two weeks from now, three weeks from now,” Romano said. 
“They’re all so beautiful and so patient.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 2.4%Jamie Paige: 5.3%California Post: 4.1%Confirmation Bias2.4%This article: 0.0%Jamie Paige: 1.0%California Post: 1.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 6.5%Jamie Paige: 5.7%California Post: 4.2%Availability Heuristic6.5%This article: 0.0%Jamie Paige: 1.4%California Post: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 2.6%Jamie Paige: 0.3%California Post: 0.8%Hindsight Bias2.6%This article: 4.5%Jamie Paige: 2.0%California Post: 2.2%Overconfidence Bias4.5%This article: 1.5%Jamie Paige: 14.3%California Post: 10.3%Framing Effect1.5%This article: 2.6%Jamie Paige: 0.8%California Post: 0.9%Loss Aversion2.6%This article: 0.0%Jamie Paige: 1.2%California Post: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 5.8%Jamie Paige: 0.1%California Post: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect5.8%This article: 12.3%Jamie Paige: 1.2%California Post: 2.5%Optimism Bias12.3%This article: 0.0%Jamie Paige: 2.1%California Post: 1.5%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 3.7%Jamie Paige: 15.8%California Post: 16.0%Negativity Bias3.7%This article: 3.0%Jamie Paige: 2.6%California Post: 2.4%Self-Serving Bias3.0%This article: 0.0%Jamie Paige: 1.4%California Post: 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Jamie Paige: 0.1%California Post: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 2.8%Jamie Paige: 2.0%California Post: 1.6%In-Group Bias2.8%This article: 0.0%Jamie Paige: 1.1%California Post: 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 7.8%Jamie Paige: 1.8%California Post: 3.1%Halo Effect7.8%This article: 0.0%Jamie Paige: 0.2%California Post: 0.6%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jamie Paige: 0.1%California Post: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 8.6%Jamie Paige: 2.6%California Post: 1.6%Recency Bias8.6%This article: 0.0%Jamie Paige: 0.5%California Post: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jamie Paige: 0.0%California Post: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jamie Paige: 2.5%California Post: 2.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Jamie Paige: 0.8%California Post: 0.5%Straw Man0.0%This article: 3.7%Jamie Paige: 2.9%California Post: 4.2%Appeal to Authority3.7%This article: 4.1%Jamie Paige: 2.7%California Post: 1.5%False Dilemma4.1%This article: 0.0%Jamie Paige: 1.5%California Post: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 3.0%Jamie Paige: 0.1%California Post: 0.2%Circular Reasoning3.0%This article: 15.9%Jamie Paige: 8.3%California Post: 5.5%Hasty Generalization15.9%This article: 0.0%Jamie Paige: 0.9%California Post: 0.7%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Jamie Paige: 0.8%California Post: 1.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 9.5%Jamie Paige: 9.5%California Post: 8.9%Appeal to Emotion9.5%This article: 0.0%Jamie Paige: 1.7%California Post: 1.1%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 10.8%Jamie Paige: 3.6%California Post: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)10.8%This article: 0.0%Jamie Paige: 0.0%California Post: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Jamie Paige: 0.8%California Post: 0.8%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Jamie Paige: 0.1%California Post: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Jamie Paige: 0.6%California Post: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 19.2%Jamie Paige: 4.5%California Post: 3.6%Anecdotal19.2%This article: 0.0%Jamie Paige: 0.1%California Post: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.2%Jamie Paige: 2.2%California Post: 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.2%This article: 0.0%Jamie Paige: 0.0%California Post: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jamie Paige: 0.1%California Post: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 1.1%Jamie Paige: 0.2%California Post: 0.1%Personal Incredulity1.1%This article: 0.0%Jamie Paige: 0.1%California Post: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Jamie Paige: 0.2%California Post: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jamie Paige: 2.4%California Post: 3.2%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Jamie Paige: 1.8%California Post: 2.1%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Jamie Paige: 12.5%California Post: 13.1%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Jamie Paige: 1.3%California Post: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 5.2%Jamie Paige: 0.9%California Post: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias5.2%This article: 0.0%Jamie Paige: 4.7%California Post: 3.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jamie Paige: 1.2%California Post: 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

464 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker62%attributed speech178writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageDaniela Romano • 40 words • 0.0% coverageDaniela Romano • 12 words • 0.0% coverageDaniela Romano • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageDaniela Romano • 13 words • 0.0% coverageDaniela Romano • 8 words • 0.0% coverageDaniela Romano • 11 words • 0.0% coverageDaniela Romano • 2 words • 0.0% coverageDaniela Romano • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageDaniela Romano • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageDaniela Romano • 12 words • 0.0% coverageDaniela Romano • 14 words • 0.0% coverageDaniela Romano • 24 words • 100.0% coverageDaniela Romano • 17 words • 0.0% coverageDaniela Romano • 12 words • 0.0% coverageDaniela Romano • 5 words • 0.0% coverageDaniela Romano • 6 words • 0.0% coverageDaniela Romano • 6 words • 0.0% coverageDaniela Romano • 13 words • 0.0% coverageDaniela Romano • 19 words • 0.0% coverageDaniela Romano • 16 words • 0.0% coverageDaniela Romano • 21 words • 0.0% coverageDaniela Romano • 7 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Daniela Romano

95%flagged-word coverage
286 attributed words100% of attributed speech75% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Politically Left Leaning B+8.4 ptsWriter: 0.0%Daniela Romano: 8.4%8.4%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.