Speaker summary
⁠44%1 analyzed article/video282.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniela Romano results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Recency Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 72 hits. Analysis detected 476.279 faulty-reasoning hits from 282.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠5% (27,064 of 28,364 speakers). This Daniela Romano is better (less manipulative) than 95.40% of the peer group.
Daniela Romano
Speaker details
Total words: 282.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

5% percentile
02550751004.6% percentile
6.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos282.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 15.2%15.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 3.6%3.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 15.0%15.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 9.3%9.3%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 8.5%8.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 5.7%5.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 11.4%11.4%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 5.1%5.1%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Speaker 3.0%3.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 15.0%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 11.4%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 9.1%Recency Bias: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 2.7%Halo Effect: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 6.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 1.5%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 0.1%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Personal Incredulity: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 0.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos