Mass California crime schemes bankrolled Bishnoi global terror gang 42%

By Ben Chapman57%

7/7/2026, 5:00:24 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 16 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Quote-first Misdirection, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 30.9% saturation with 175 hits. Analysis detected 1,114 faulty-reasoning hits from 566 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 46.2% and a BS Rank of 42% (12,716 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 58.10% of the article peer group.

A sprawling global web of gangsters targeted in a massive federal takedown used California as its cash register to rake in millions of dollars through extortion schemes, contract killings, and drug and gun trafficking, authorities revealed. 
Local and federal officials on Tuesday arrested 11 accused members of transnational, India-based gangs and their affiliates in the Golden State as part of a case dubbed “Operation Hard Ball.” 
Los Angeles' top federal prosecutor, Bill Essayli, described the gangs as the most powerful you’ve never heard of, allegedly reaping millions of dollars in illegal profits from drug deals, extortion, weapons sales and theft. 
“These criminal organizations have engaged in widespread violence, including targeted killings, extortions and kidnappings,” and “flooded communities around the country with massive quantities of cocaine and methamphetamine,” Essayli said. 
The feared Bishnoi gang founded by Lawrence Bishnoi, who remains locked in an Indian prison, used Whatsapp to direct the movements of hundreds of pounds of drugs across California and extort victims from LA and Thousand Oaks, court documents show. 
“Using contraband cellphones and other… devices smuggled into his jail cell, defendant Bishnoi personally directed political assassinations, murders, shootings, extortions, kidnappings, drug trafficking, human smuggling, and other crimes,” the documents say. 
Members of another India-based crime outfit  the Bhagwanpuria gang, led by imprisoned Indian mastermind Jaggu Bhagwanpuria, 38  are accused of ruthlessly exploiting their connections to extort victims, federal officials said. 
Bhagwanpuria gang member Gurlal Singh, 22, of Stockton, Calif., allegedly conspired with a corrupt cop in India’s Punjab state to falsely accuse their victims of murder and extort them over the pending case. 
Another member of the Bhagwanpuria gang, Gurdev Singh, 26, is alleged to have attempted to extort a family while he was being held in ICE custody, using smuggled communication devices to threaten to “put bullets in your kids.” 
Bhagwanpuria himself “personally directed the transportation and distribution of large loads of cocaine within California from his jail in India,” prosecutors charge. 
Federal prosecutors also charged British Columbia resident Ravinder Singh Dhanda, 57, with smuggling hundreds of pounds of cocaine and methamphetamine each week from the US into Canada. 
Dhanda’s gang used semi trucks and farming trucks to move the drugs from Los Angeles, West Covina, Ontario, Fontana and Perris to the US-Canada border, court papers say. 
Accused Dhanda drug trafficker Justin Guzman, of El Monte, was arrested Tuesday at the Metro station where he works a day job. 
Guzman is accused in a federal charging document of smuggling more than 150 pounds of cocaine for the gang. 
Accused gang members were arrested in Los Angeles, Fresno, Sacramento, Stockton, San Jose and other California cities in Tuesday’s takedown, law enforcement officials said. 
Twenty-three search warrants were executed in the Sacramento area, and 19 were served in Los Angeles. 
“They’re people who used LA as kind of the crossroads of their criminal enterprise, whether it’s drugs, extortion, murder, or other things,” said LAPD Chief Jim McDonnell. 
Authorities on Tuesday conducted at least 50 raids in the US, Canada and Europe. 
Other suspects were arrested in Indiana and Georgia, along with three in Canada and one in Spain. 
As part of the investigation, law enforcement seized more than 2,200 pounds of cocaine and heroin, $40,000 cash and a dozen firearms. 
Authorities are also hunting seven fugitives in the US, two in India and one in Europe. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 9.9%Ben Chapman: 4.4%California Post: 4.1%Confirmation Bias9.9%This article: 0.0%Ben Chapman: 0.3%California Post: 1.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 13.6%Ben Chapman: 7.7%California Post: 4.2%Availability Heuristic13.6%This article: 0.0%Ben Chapman: 0.4%California Post: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Chapman: 0.6%California Post: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Chapman: 2.4%California Post: 2.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 6.4%Ben Chapman: 10.1%California Post: 10.3%Framing Effect6.4%This article: 0.0%Ben Chapman: 0.0%California Post: 0.9%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Chapman: 0.8%California Post: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Chapman: 0.0%California Post: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 2.8%Ben Chapman: 2.2%California Post: 2.5%Optimism Bias2.8%This article: 0.0%Ben Chapman: 1.2%California Post: 1.5%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 30.9%Ben Chapman: 18.4%California Post: 16.0%Negativity Bias30.9%This article: 0.0%Ben Chapman: 1.4%California Post: 2.4%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Chapman: 0.2%California Post: 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Chapman: 0.0%California Post: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 5.7%Ben Chapman: 0.2%California Post: 1.6%In-Group Bias5.7%This article: 0.0%Ben Chapman: 1.4%California Post: 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 7.1%Ben Chapman: 1.8%California Post: 3.1%Halo Effect7.1%This article: 0.0%Ben Chapman: 0.9%California Post: 0.6%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Chapman: 0.0%California Post: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Chapman: 1.3%California Post: 1.6%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 7.1%Ben Chapman: 0.4%California Post: 0.5%Primacy Effect7.1%This article: 0.0%Ben Chapman: 0.0%California Post: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Chapman: 1.1%California Post: 2.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Chapman: 0.0%California Post: 0.5%Straw Man0.0%This article: 6.0%Ben Chapman: 5.3%California Post: 4.2%Appeal to Authority6.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Chapman: 0.3%California Post: 1.5%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Chapman: 0.4%California Post: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Chapman: 0.2%California Post: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 5.5%Ben Chapman: 3.4%California Post: 5.5%Hasty Generalization5.5%This article: 0.0%Ben Chapman: 0.7%California Post: 0.7%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Chapman: 1.7%California Post: 1.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 18.2%Ben Chapman: 10.1%California Post: 8.9%Appeal to Emotion18.2%This article: 5.8%Ben Chapman: 1.5%California Post: 1.1%Begging the Question5.8%This article: 0.0%Ben Chapman: 1.5%California Post: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Chapman: 0.0%California Post: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Chapman: 0.3%California Post: 0.8%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Chapman: 0.2%California Post: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Chapman: 0.0%California Post: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Chapman: 1.8%California Post: 3.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Chapman: 0.1%California Post: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Chapman: 2.0%California Post: 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Chapman: 0.0%California Post: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Chapman: 0.0%California Post: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Chapman: 0.0%California Post: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Chapman: 0.1%California Post: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Chapman: 0.0%California Post: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 28.8%Ben Chapman: 3.4%California Post: 3.2%Unattributed Quote28.8%This article: 22.6%Ben Chapman: 3.3%California Post: 2.1%Quote-first Misdirection22.6%This article: 20.7%Ben Chapman: 15.6%California Post: 13.1%Biased Writer Voice20.7%This article: 0.0%Ben Chapman: 2.0%California Post: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 5.8%Ben Chapman: 0.2%California Post: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias5.8%This article: 0.0%Ben Chapman: 0.3%California Post: 3.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Chapman: 0.3%California Post: 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

566 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers16%attributed speech476writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageBill Essayli • 34 words • 100.0% coverageBill Essayli • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageJim McDonnell • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Bill Essayli

100%flagged-word coverage
63 attributed words70% of attributed speech71% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection+92.0 ptsWriter: 8.0%Bill Essayli: 100.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+79.0 ptsWriter: 21.0%Bill Essayli: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-24.6 ptsWriter: 24.6%Bill Essayli: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B-6.9 ptsWriter: 6.9%Bill Essayli: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.