Topic summary
⁠25%3 analyzed articles/videos931 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gang Activity results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 662 hits. Analysis detected 4,470 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,844 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (7,517 of 16,312 topics). This Gang Activity is worse (more manipulative) than 53.90% of the peer group.
Gang Activity
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,844
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

54% percentile
025507510053.9% percentile
3.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.1%6.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.7%13.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.3%5.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.5%3.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 3.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 5.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos