Author summary
32%3 analyzed articles/videos691 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Edvard Pettersson results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 412 hits. Analysis detected 3,244 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,193 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 29% (4,709 of 6,611 authors). This Edvard Pettersson is better (less manipulative) than 71.20% of the peer group.
Edvard Pettersson
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
29%Edvard Pettersson (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,193
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

29% percentile
025507510028.8% percentile
2.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.6%4.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.0%5.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.8%6.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.3%2.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.9%0.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.5%2.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 7.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.9%Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate