Author summary
57% 10 analyzed articles/videos 3,667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ben Chapman results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.4% saturation with 3,154 hits . Analysis detected 19,146 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,129 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 49% (3,308 of 6,377 authors). This Ben Chapman is better (less manipulative) than 51.90% of the peer group. Ben Chapman
Author details
Total words: 17,129
Article count: 10
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
48% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 48.1% percentile 2.5% BS Score10 analyzed articles17.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.1% 10.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 15.6% 15.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.1% 10.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.3% 5.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.2% 2.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 18.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.1%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 7.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst