Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video664 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joe Burn results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 28.1% saturation with 560 hits. Analysis detected 3,188 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,992 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.7% and a BS Rank of 87% (875 of 6,427 authors). This Joe Burn is worse (more manipulative) than 86.40% of the peer group.
Joe Burn
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
87%Joe Burn (selected)6%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,992
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

86% percentile
025507510086.4% percentile
5.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.8%8.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 21.0%21.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 28.1%28.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 13.9%13.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 5.7%5.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.6%5.6%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 7.3%7.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 4.1%4.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.6%3.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Author 28.1%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Author 8.8%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 21.0%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.8%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 13.9%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 12.6%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.6%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Author 5.7%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 4.9%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Red Herring: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.7%Bandwagon: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.4%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos