Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,142 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Extortion results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.5% saturation with 1,501 hits. Analysis detected 8,408 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,980 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (7,352 of 16,562 topics). This Extortion is worse (more manipulative) than 55.60% of the peer group.
Extortion
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,980
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

56% percentile
025507510055.6% percentile
3.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.0%10.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.0%6.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.4%5.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.2%6.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.8%1.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.2%3.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.4%1.4%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 21.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 4.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Burden of Proof: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos