Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,392 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cecilia Nowell results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Biased Writer Voice , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 1,227 hits . Analysis detected 7,087 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,741 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 10% (5,564 of 6,162 authors). This Cecilia Nowell is better (less manipulative) than 90.30% of the peer group. Cecilia Nowell
Author details
Total words: 12,741
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.7% percentile 1.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles12.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.6% 9.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst