Author summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos2,261 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anna Betts results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 1,401 hits. Analysis detected 7,790 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,592 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 50% (3,128 of 6,164 authors). This Anna Betts is better (less manipulative) than 50.70% of the peer group.
Anna Betts
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
50%Anna Betts (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 8,592
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

49% percentile
025507510049.3% percentile
2.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.2%3.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 16.3%16.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 13.2%13.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.4%3.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.2%3.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.6%0.6%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 6.3%6.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.3%3.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 16.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 13.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 2.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Ad Hominem: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate