Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,392 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rachel Savage results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Hindsight Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 20.2% saturation with 561 hits. Analysis detected 1,016 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,784 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 55% (2,859 of 6,359 authors). This Rachel Savage is worse (more manipulative) than 55.00% of the peer group.
Rachel Savage
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
55%Rachel Savage (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,784
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

55% percentile
025507510055.0% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.2%4.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.4%0.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 20.1%20.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.7%3.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.9%0.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.8%0.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.2%1.2%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Author 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 20.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.4%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.4%Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos