Author summary
55% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,392 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chris Stein results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Hasty Generalization , and In-Group Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 1,424 hits . Analysis detected 6,938 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,848 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 27% (4,514 of 6,164 authors). This Chris Stein is better (less manipulative) than 73.20% of the peer group. Chris Stein
Author details
Total words: 9,848
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 26.8% percentile 1.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.6% 4.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 14.5% 14.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.2% 8.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.1% 0.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.5% 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 14.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.0% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Begging the Question: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst