Speaker summary
48% 82 analyzed articles/videos 7,325.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Todd Blanche results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation) , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 966.528 hits . Analysis detected 10,956.185 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,325.333 analyzed words across 82 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 1% (28,135 of 28,223 speakers). This Todd Blanche is better (less manipulative) than 99.70% of the peer group. Todd Blanche
Speaker details
Total words: 7,325.333
Article count: 82
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.3% percentile 2.3% BS Score82 analyzed videos7.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 5.9% 5.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 8.4% 8.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 2.1% 2.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 9.8% 9.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 5.5% 5.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 3.0% 3.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 5.6% 5.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 3.7% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 0.8% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Begging the Question: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 1.7% Special Pleading: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 0.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst