Author summary
55% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,022 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Warner Todd Huston results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.1% saturation with 646 hits . Analysis detected 4,402 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,572 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 72% (1,758 of 6,170 authors). This Warner Todd Huston is worse (more manipulative) than 71.50% of the peer group. Warner Todd Huston
Author details
Total words: 3,572
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
72% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 71.5% percentile 3.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 13.8% 13.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.1% 6.1% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 8.0% 8.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 7.8% 7.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 8.9% 8.9% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 13.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 18.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 8.7%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.9%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 8.0%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 1.4% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.4% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst