Author summary
88%2 analyzed articles/videos2,430 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ben Wieder results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 904 hits. Analysis detected 7,462 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,800 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 51% (3,279 of 6,628 authors). This Ben Wieder is worse (more manipulative) than 50.50% of the peer group.
Ben Wieder
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
51%Ben Wieder (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,800
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

51% percentile
025507510050.5% percentile
2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.7%8.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 10.3%10.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.9%2.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 13.3%13.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.0%4.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.2%1.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 10.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Author 13.3%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 9.9%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Author 6.7%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.6%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.5%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate