Speaker summary
54% 10 analyzed articles/videos 777 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pope Leo XIV results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Framing Effect , and Indoctrination , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 18.6% saturation with 144.261 hits . Analysis detected 1,204.404 faulty-reasoning hits from 777 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.5% and a BS Rank of 4% (26,011 of 26,870 speakers). This Pope Leo XIV is better (less manipulative) than 96.80% of the peer group. Pope Leo XIV
Speaker details
Total words: 777
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.2% percentile 5.5% BS Score10 analyzed videos777 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 4.1% 4.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 12.3% 12.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 11.8% 11.8% Appeal to Nature Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 8.0% 8.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 12.3% 12.3% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 7.0% 7.0% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 5.2% 5.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 2.2% 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 1.4% 1.4% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 5.1% 5.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 18.6%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 6.7% Indoctrination: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 11.1% Appeal to Nature: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 0.2% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% Begging the Question: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 1.7% In-Group Bias: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 5.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 2.5% Slippery Slope: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Composition/Division: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 0.2% Middle Ground: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst