Speaker summary
54%10 analyzed articles/videos777 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pope Leo XIV results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Framing Effect, and Indoctrination, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 18.6% saturation with 144.261 hits. Analysis detected 1,204.404 faulty-reasoning hits from 777 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.5% and a BS Rank of 4% (26,011 of 26,870 speakers). This Pope Leo XIV is better (less manipulative) than 96.80% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

3% percentile
02550751003.2% percentile
5.5% BS Score10 analyzed videos777 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 4.1%4.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 12.3%12.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 11.8%11.8%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 8.0%8.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 12.3%12.3%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 7.0%7.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 5.2%5.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 2.2%2.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 1.4%1.4%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 5.1%5.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 18.6%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 0.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%Begging the Question: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 1.7%In-Group Bias: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 5.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 2.5%Slippery Slope: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Composition/Division: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 0.2%Middle Ground: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate