Author summary
0%6 analyzed articles/videos2,695 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jordan King results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Halo Effect, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 1,360 hits. Analysis detected 9,542 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,715 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 7% (5,767 of 6,170 authors). This Jordan King is better (less manipulative) than 93.50% of the peer group.
Jordan King
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
7%Jordan King (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 18,715
Article count: 6
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

7% percentile
02550751006.5% percentile
1.3% BS Score6 analyzed articles18.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.3%7.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.8%3.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.4%5.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.4%3.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.3%2.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.6%2.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate