Newsweek32%

What Happens If Rebel Catholics Defy Pope Leo 9%

By Jordan King0%

6/28/2026, 8:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 9 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and In-Group Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 28.2% saturation with 312 hits. Analysis detected 726 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,108 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 25.8% and a BS Rank of 9% (18,786 of 20,516 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 91.60% of the article peer group.

A traditionalist rebel Catholic group is days away from triggering one of the most serious penalties in the Catholic Church: excommunication. 
The Society of St. 
Pius X (SSPX) is planning to consecrate four bishops in defiance of Pope Leo XIV, raising the prospect of the biggest rupture between Rome and the group in decades. 
Why SSPX Is Facing Excommunication? 
The SSPX, a breakaway ultraconservative priestly fraternity that has spent decades at odds with the Vatican over theology, announced in May that it plans to consecrate four priests as bishops on July 1. 
However, in the Catholic Church, bishops cannot be consecrated without the pope's approval. 
Bishops are responsible for leading the church and maintaining communion with Rome, making unauthorized consecrations one of the most serious breaches of church authority. 
The Vatican's head of discipline, Cardinal Víctor Manuel Fernández, warned the SSPX last month that going ahead with its plans would constitute "a schismatic act," which would entail "excommunication established by the law of the church." 
The warning has not deterred the SSPX, which went on to announce the names of the four priests it plans to make bishops: 
* Michael Goldade (United States) 
* Pascal Schreiber (Switzerland) 
* Michel Poinsinet de Sivry (Frane) 
* Marc Hanappier (France) 
SSPX Superior General Davide Pagliarani said in a letter to Leo that while members "have no other desire than that of living and being confirmed in the Roman Catholic Faith," they would "rather die than renounce" their traditionalist principles. 
On Friday, the SSPX revealed the episcopal coats of arms of the four "future bishops" it plans to consecrate, in the most recent sign yet that it intends to proceed despite Vatican warnings. 
What the Pope Has Said About SSPX 
Leo himself spoke out about the feud for the first time earlier this month, telling reporters that the SSPX was making its own decision to be excommunicated. 
"If they make that choice, I am sorry, but we must move forward," he said. 
The SSPX declined to comment further. 
Newsweek has contacted the Vatican for comment via email. 
Besides the breaking of canon law, not excommunicating the SSPX is an "ever-losing PR battle," Catholic theologian Grant Kaplan of Saint Louis University, told Newsweek, adding, "That makes the Vatican look quite bad." 
He argued that ordinary Catholics who adhere to Rome's authority would wonder why the SSPX is seemingly able to persist in what they see as open rebellion against the Vatican. 
The SSPX believes the Holy See has been out of step with what the church should be since it introduced reforms in the 1960s, after the Second Vatican Council, carrying out more than 50 years of modernist "errors that are destroying Catholic faith and morals." 
Pagliarani has also argued that the consecrations are necessary for practical reasons. 
As the SSPX is growing, it needs more than its two existing bishops, both of whom are approaching their 70s, for the group to continue. 
What Is Excommunication? 
Excommunication is the Catholic Church's most severe ecclesiastical penalty, but it is intended to encourage repentance rather than permanently expel someone from the faith. 
Described as "medicinal" in canon law, it is designed to bring someone back into communion with the church. 
The "church really only just declares excommunication," Kaplan said. 
"It's never pushing people out. 
It's just simply affirming that you've pushed yourself out." 
Historically, excommunication carried significant social consequences because communities were smaller and everyone knew who had been cut off from the church, Kaplan said. 
Today, it primarily means someone is barred from receiving the sacraments—such as Holy Communion, confession and marriage—until they repent. 
Choosing to receive the sacraments, which Catholics believe are the "means of salvation," despite being excommunicated would be "a further condemnation upon yourself" and "extremely frowned upon," Kaplan said. 
For many committed SSPX members, however, the practical impact may be limited as the fraternity is expected to continue celebrating Mass and administering the sacraments despite the excommunications. 
The split may be more significant for what Kaplan described as "moderate SSPX members"—those who believed the fraternity remained within the bounds of the Catholic Church despite its irregular status 
"I imagine most of them will probably dig their heels in, but I imagine some of them will think, The game is up, and join a traditional Catholic parish," Kaplan said. 
Who Would Be Excommunicated? 
While the Vatican has not said exactly who would be excommunicated if the Society of St. 
Pius X proceeds with the July 1 consecrations, church law provides a clear guide. 
Under Canon 1383 of the Code of Canon Law, both the bishop who consecrates another bishop without a papal mandate and the person receiving the consecration incur automatic, or <em>latae sententiae</em>, excommunication. 
The Vatican applied that principle in 1988 after the SSPX's founder, Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, consecrated four bishops without the approval of Pope John Paul II. 
In a decree issued the following day, the Congregation for Bishops declared that Lefebvre, the four newly consecrated bishops and the co-consecrating bishop, Antônio de Castro Mayer, had all incurred automatic excommunication. 
Notably, the decree did not excommunicate ordinary SSPX priests or lay Catholics who attended SSPX chapels. 
Instead, it warned the faithful not to support what it described as a schismatic act. 
If the July 1 ceremony goes ahead as planned, this means the four priests named for consecration would be excommunicated. 
The society has not publicly identified who will perform the consecrations. 
How Does Excommunication Happen? 
If the SSPX goes ahead with its consecrations and Leo follows through on his warnings, Rome will likely publish a letter signed by the pope and Vatican secretaries and "communicated in the most formal way that they could possibly communicate anything," Kaplan said. 
"It has been a kind of torturous path for the Vatican because they don't want to excommunicate them," he added. 
The Vatican has spent decades trying to reconcile with the SSPX, most notably in 2009, when Pope Benedict XVI lifted the excommunications of the surviving bishops consecrated in 1988. 
"I think Francis did not have the patience for them and now Leo is sort of continuing Francis' line," Kaplan said. 
Meanwhile, the SSPX believes it is "holding down the fort until the Catholic Church disentangles itself from all these bad modern ideas," Kaplan said. 
Leo said earlier in June: "Certainly, division among Christians is always a painful point, but they refuse to accept certain fundamental elements of the Church, starting with various points of the Second Vatican Council. 
If they make that choice, I am sorry, but we must move forward." 
Contact Newsweek editors on this story: Tobias Meyjes and Shakeema Edwards. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Jordan King: 2.6%Newsweek: 2.9%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jordan King: 0.1%Newsweek: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jordan King: 1.0%Newsweek: 2.7%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Jordan King: 0.1%Newsweek: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Jordan King: 0.4%Newsweek: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 4.7%Jordan King: 0.6%Newsweek: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias4.7%This article: 28.2%Jordan King: 7.3%Newsweek: 6.4%Framing Effect28.2%This article: 0.0%Jordan King: 0.0%Newsweek: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Jordan King: 0.0%Newsweek: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jordan King: 0.0%Newsweek: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jordan King: 1.5%Newsweek: 1.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jordan King: 0.9%Newsweek: 1.5%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 4.1%Jordan King: 3.8%Newsweek: 6.6%Negativity Bias4.1%This article: 0.0%Jordan King: 1.6%Newsweek: 1.4%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jordan King: 0.0%Newsweek: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Jordan King: 0.2%Newsweek: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 5.4%Jordan King: 1.7%Newsweek: 1.3%In-Group Bias5.4%This article: 0.0%Jordan King: 0.1%Newsweek: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jordan King: 3.6%Newsweek: 2.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jordan King: 0.0%Newsweek: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jordan King: 0.0%Newsweek: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jordan King: 1.1%Newsweek: 1.5%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jordan King: 0.1%Newsweek: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jordan King: 0.0%Newsweek: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jordan King: 0.5%Newsweek: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Jordan King: 0.2%Newsweek: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 3.0%Jordan King: 3.4%Newsweek: 4.2%Appeal to Authority3.0%This article: 3.5%Jordan King: 1.3%Newsweek: 1.9%False Dilemma3.5%This article: 0.0%Jordan King: 0.4%Newsweek: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Jordan King: 0.3%Newsweek: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 7.4%Jordan King: 2.3%Newsweek: 4.5%Hasty Generalization7.4%This article: 0.0%Jordan King: 0.0%Newsweek: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Jordan King: 0.0%Newsweek: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 7.9%Jordan King: 5.4%Newsweek: 4.0%Appeal to Emotion7.9%This article: 0.0%Jordan King: 0.5%Newsweek: 0.9%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Jordan King: 2.9%Newsweek: 3.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Jordan King: 0.3%Newsweek: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Jordan King: 0.3%Newsweek: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Jordan King: 0.1%Newsweek: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Jordan King: 0.3%Newsweek: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Jordan King: 0.7%Newsweek: 1.3%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Jordan King: 0.0%Newsweek: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Jordan King: 1.3%Newsweek: 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Jordan King: 0.0%Newsweek: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jordan King: 0.0%Newsweek: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Jordan King: 0.0%Newsweek: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Jordan King: 0.1%Newsweek: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Jordan King: 0.0%Newsweek: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jordan King: 0.3%Newsweek: 1.5%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 1.4%Jordan King: 0.6%Newsweek: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection1.4%This article: 0.0%Jordan King: 2.2%Newsweek: 3.4%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Jordan King: 0.2%Newsweek: 0.8%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Jordan King: 0.0%Newsweek: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jordan King: 0.0%Newsweek: 0.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jordan King: 0.3%Newsweek: 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

1108 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers40%attributed speech664writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageCardinal Víctor Manuel Fernández • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageDavide Pagliarani • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coveragePope Leo XIV • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageGrant Kaplan • 33 words • 0.0% coverageGrant Kaplan • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 45 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageGrant Kaplan • 9 words • 0.0% coverageGrant Kaplan • 5 words • 0.0% coverageGrant Kaplan • 9 words • 0.0% coverageGrant Kaplan • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageGrant Kaplan • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageGrant Kaplan • 30 words • 0.0% coverageGrant Kaplan • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageGrant Kaplan • 43 words • 0.0% coverageGrant Kaplan • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageGrant Kaplan • 21 words • 0.0% coverageGrant Kaplan • 24 words • 0.0% coveragePope Leo XIV • 34 words • 0.0% coveragePope Leo XIV • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Davide Pagliarani

100%flagged-word coverage
39 attributed words8.8% of attributed speech45% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.