Topic summary
38% 8 analyzed articles/videos 3,799 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pope Leo Xiv results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 2,101 hits . Analysis detected 12,802 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,370 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 11% (14,052 of 15,753 topics). This Pope Leo Xiv is better (less manipulative) than 89.20% of the peer group. Pope Leo Xiv
Topic details
Total words: 18,370
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.8% percentile 1.6% BS Score8 analyzed articles18.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 11.4% 11.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst