Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,636 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nicole Winfield results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Halo Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 607 hits . Analysis detected 6,008 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,544 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 39% (3,887 of 6,350 authors). This Nicole Winfield is better (less manipulative) than 61.20% of the peer group. Nicole Winfield
Author details
Total words: 6,544
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.8% percentile 2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.0% 8.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.2% 5.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.3% 9.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.7% 6.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Author 5.1%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Begging the Question: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst