Topic summary
0% 12 analyzed articles/videos 6,132 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vatican results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Halo Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 2,881 hits . Analysis detected 20,268 faulty-reasoning hits from 26,074 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 12% (13,987 of 15,886 topics). This Vatican is better (less manipulative) than 88.00% of the peer group. Vatican
Topic details
Total words: 26,074
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.0% percentile 1.7% BS Score11 analyzed articles26.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 11.1% 11.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst