Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,081 analyzed words
BS Summary: These PAOLO SANTALUCIA results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Halo Effect, and False Dilemma, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 439 hits. Analysis detected 3,921 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,324 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 50% (3,326 of 6,628 authors). This PAOLO SANTALUCIA is better (less manipulative) than 50.20% of the peer group.
PAOLO SANTALUCIA
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
50%PAOLO SANTALUCIA (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,324
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

50% percentile
025507510049.8% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.3%5.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.3%4.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.2%8.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.9%0.9%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 5.9%5.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 10.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Author 7.9%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Author 5.9%, sitewide 1.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 4.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 2.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Primacy Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos