Author summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos183 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Axel Boada results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 27.1% saturation with 354 hits. Analysis detected 2,531 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,304 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.9% and a BS Rank of 90% (630 of 6,169 authors). This Axel Boada is worse (more manipulative) than 89.80% of the peer group.
Axel Boada
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
90%Axel Boada (selected)7%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,304
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

90% percentile
025507510089.8% percentile
6.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 19.8%19.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 18.5%18.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 27.1%27.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 17.2%17.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 9.5%9.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 8.8%8.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 9.6%9.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.9%3.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 13.7%13.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Author 27.1%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Author 17.2%, sitewide 26.9%Self-Serving Bias: Author 19.8%, sitewide 3.7%Negativity Bias: Author 13.7%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 18.5%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Pessimism Bias: Author 9.6%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Author 9.5%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 8.8%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Author 8.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 7.1%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.8%, sitewide 0.5%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.1%Circular Reasoning: Author 4.2%, sitewide 0.1%False Dilemma: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.7%Slippery Slope: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.5%Dunning-Kruger Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos