Publication summary
0% 92 analyzed articles/videos 111,357 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The New York Times results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 40,910 hits . Analysis detected 289,536 faulty-reasoning hits from 436,582 analyzed words across 91 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 13% (330 of 379 publications). This The New York Times is better (less manipulative) than 87.00% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 436,582
Article count: 91
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.0% percentile 1.2% BS Score91 analyzed articles436.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 9.4% 9.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 4.0% 4.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 2.7% 2.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 5.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 9.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 3.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst