Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 601 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Yaffe-Bellany results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Hindsight Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.2% saturation with 462 hits . Analysis detected 2,228 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,404 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 67% (2,053 of 6,202 authors). This David Yaffe-Bellany is worse (more manipulative) than 66.90% of the peer group. David Yaffe-Bellany
Author details
Total words: 2,404
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.9% percentile 3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 19.2% 19.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 16.9% 16.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.4% 0.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 15.3% 15.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 16.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 15.3%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 19.2%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Hindsight Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Begging the Question: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst