Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 166 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Julie Yoon results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Authority , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 102 hits . Analysis detected 920 faulty-reasoning hits from 664 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.5% and a BS Rank of 86% (906 of 6,202 authors). This Julie Yoon is worse (more manipulative) than 85.40% of the peer group. Julie Yoon
Author details
Total words: 664
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
85% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 85.4% percentile 5.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles664 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.2% 7.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 14.9% 14.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 10.1% 10.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.8% 10.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 5.9% 5.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 11.8% 11.8% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Author 5.4% 5.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 14.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 15.4%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 11.8%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 10.8%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.8%, sitewide 5.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 10.1%, sitewide 3.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 7.1%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 6.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 1.4% Loss Aversion: Author 5.4%, sitewide 2.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Primacy Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.9% Indoctrination: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst