Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Jorge Mitssunaga results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 25.5% saturation with 217 hits. Analysis detected 2,013 faulty-reasoning hits from 852 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,244 authors). This Jorge Mitssunaga is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Jorge Mitssunaga
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Jorge Mitssunaga (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 852
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles852 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.3%7.3%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 20.7%20.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 22.9%22.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 15.5%15.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 19.8%19.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 10.7%10.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 25.5%25.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 10.1%10.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 9.9%9.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 8.3%8.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Author 25.5%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Author 22.9%, sitewide 6.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 20.7%, sitewide 1.4%Availability Heuristic: Author 19.8%, sitewide 9.1%Negativity Bias: Author 10.1%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 15.5%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Author 13.7%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 10.8%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 10.7%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Author 9.9%, sitewide 1.5%Halo Effect: Author 8.7%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Author 8.3%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 5.2%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 1.9%Primacy Effect: Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.9%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos