Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video710 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ben Laffin results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 23.8% saturation with 675 hits. Analysis detected 3,564 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,840 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 71% (1,799 of 6,202 authors). This Ben Laffin is worse (more manipulative) than 71.00% of the peer group.
Ben Laffin
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
71%Ben Laffin (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,840
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

71% percentile
025507510071.0% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 11.8%11.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 12.2%12.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 23.8%23.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 12.5%12.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.4%3.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 6.4%6.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 11.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Author 23.8%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Author 12.5%, sitewide 19.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 12.2%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 6.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 5.8%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Circular Reasoning: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Bandwagon: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.4%Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos