Speaker summary
78% 7 analyzed articles/videos 256 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Laura Ingraham results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Politically Right Leaning Bias , and Indoctrination , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 37% saturation with 111.132 hits . Analysis detected 867.056 faulty-reasoning hits from 256 analyzed words across 7 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 14.1% and a BS Rank of 21% (22,569 of 28,364 speakers). This Laura Ingraham is better (less manipulative) than 79.60% of the peer group. Laura Ingraham
Speaker details
Total words: 256
Content count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.4% percentile 14.1% BS Score7 analyzed videos256 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 31.3% 31.3% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 30.7% 30.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 31.0% 31.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 4.8% 4.8% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 21.7% 21.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 21.4% 21.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 37.0% 37.0% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 11.0% 11.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 16.4% 16.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 17.2% 17.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Speaker 37.0%, sitewide 19.2% Indoctrination: Speaker 31.3%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 31.0%, sitewide 5.3% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 30.7%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 23.3%, sitewide 15.9% Slippery Slope: Speaker 21.7%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 21.4%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 17.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 16.4%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 6.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 11.0%, sitewide 11.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 11.0%, sitewide 0.0% Ad Hominem: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 6.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 3.1% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst