Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 872 analyzed words
BS Summary: These James P. Pinkerton results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Framing Effect , and Unattributed Quote , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 1,236 hits . Analysis detected 11,120 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,224 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 27% (4,686 of 6,365 authors). This James P. Pinkerton is better (less manipulative) than 73.60% of the peer group. James P. Pinkerton
Author details
Total words: 12,224
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 26.4% percentile 1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles12.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.8% 6.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.7% 1.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 5.9% 5.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.1% 10.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.1%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 5.9%, sitewide 1.1% Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst