Speaker summary
70% 11 analyzed articles/videos 1,905 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jimmy Kimmel results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Self-Serving Bias , with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 29.4% saturation with 560.228 hits . Analysis detected 4,384.91 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,905 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 2% (26,230 of 26,731 speakers). This Jimmy Kimmel is better (less manipulative) than 98.10% of the peer group. Jimmy Kimmel
Speaker details
Total words: 1,905
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.9% percentile 4.4% BS Score11 analyzed videos1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 29.4% 29.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 2.4% 2.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 11.6% 11.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 2.2% 2.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 5.4% 5.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 1.0% 1.0% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 6.4% 6.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 5.6% 5.6% Special Pleading Sitewide 0.3% Speaker 5.1% 5.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Ad Hominem: Speaker 29.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 16.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 14.1%, sitewide 15.9% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 6.7% False Dilemma: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 1.5% Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 0.8% Indoctrination: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Special Pleading: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 0.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 2.0% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Horn Effect: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 1.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Ad Hominem Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst