Fox News89%

Spencer Pratt fires back at Jimmy Kimmel's mockery by resurfacing host's blackface controversy 60%

By Alexander Hall0%

6/6/2026, 12:00:12 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 29.9% saturation with 162 hits. Analysis detected 1,278 faulty-reasoning hits from 541 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 55.8% and a BS Rank of 60% (8,889 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 59.40% of the article peer group.

Talk show host Jimmy Kimmel mocked Los Angeles mayoral candidate Spencer Pratt on Wednesday night’s show, and the former reality TV star responded by bringing up one of Kimmel’s most embarrassing controversies. 
Pratt is one of the contenders attempting to replace incumbent Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass. 
Pratt, 42, has been a vocal champion for LA residents since losing his home during the deadly 2025 Palisades wildfire. 
He launched his mayoral campaign in January with a focus on ousting Bass due to her alleged mishandling of the LA fires. 
"It could take a while for Democrats here in Los Angeles to figure out which of their friends secretly voted for Spencer Pratt," Kimmel quipped, riffing on California taking a long time to tally votes in recent elections. 
"Barring a late ballot buzzer-beater, it appears Mayor Karen Bass will advance to a runoff against the former reality show villain." 
JIMMY KIMMEL ATTACKS FIRE VICTIM SPENCER PRATT AS 'SCREAMING JERK,' LECTURES LA VOTERS ABOUT MAYORAL ELECTION 
"Sixty percent of the vote has been counted. 
If that holds, it means in November Los Angelenos are going to have to choose between a woman named Karen and a man who is one," he said, referencing the "Karen" slur for a demanding, middle-class White woman. 
"Spencer Pratt should not be a top-two finalist for mayor. 
He should be DJing the worst New Year’s Eve party in Reno right now," Kimmel said. 
"He’s unlikely to win. 
In fact, he’s already filming a reality show about his run for mayor, so he definitely has his priorities in order." 
In response, Pratt replied by sharing an image of Kimmel’s now-infamous moment when the talk show host wore blackface during "The Man Show" in the early 2000s, most notably while impersonating former NBA star Karl Malone. 
Kimmel has apologized for this skit in recent years, saying he intended for it to be just another celebrity impression. 
"We hired makeup artists to make me look as much like Karl Malone as possible. 
I never considered that this might be seen as anything other than an imitation of a fellow human being, one that had no more to do with Karl’s skin color than it did his bulging muscles and bald head," he said in a past statement to Fox News. 
TED DANSON SAYS HE WANTS TO 'APOLOGIZE FOREVER' FOR DOING BLACKFACE AT WHOOPI GOLDBERG ROAST 
He added further, "I’ve done dozens of impressions of famous people, including Snoop Dogg, Oprah, Eminem, Dick Vitale, Rosie and many others. 
In each case, I thought of them as impersonations of celebrities and nothing more. 
Looking back, many of these sketches are embarrassing, and it is frustrating that these thoughtless moments have become a weapon used by some to diminish my criticisms of social and other injustices." 
"I won’t be bullied into silence by those who feign outrage to advance their oppressive and genuinely racist agendas," Kimmel vowed, later adding, "Thank you for giving me an opportunity to explain and to those I’ve disappointed, I am sorry." 
Fox News’ Joseph Wulfsohn contributed to this report. 
CLICK HERE FOR MORE COVERAGE OF MEDIA AND CULTURE 
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.7%Alexander Hall: 6.1%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias6.7%This article: 0.0%Alexander Hall: 0.4%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 6.7%Alexander Hall: 1.5%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic6.7%This article: 0.0%Alexander Hall: 0.5%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Hall: 1.3%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Hall: 12.6%Fox Nation: 3.0%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 19.4%Alexander Hall: 8.9%Fox Nation: 11.9%Framing Effect19.4%This article: 0.0%Alexander Hall: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Hall: 1.0%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 3.9%Alexander Hall: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect3.9%This article: 3.7%Alexander Hall: 0.9%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias3.7%This article: 0.7%Alexander Hall: 5.6%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.7%This article: 29.9%Alexander Hall: 16.6%Fox Nation: 10.8%Negativity Bias29.9%This article: 28.8%Alexander Hall: 8.4%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias28.8%This article: 0.0%Alexander Hall: 4.6%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Hall: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 14.4%Alexander Hall: 9.5%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias14.4%This article: 0.0%Alexander Hall: 12.4%Fox Nation: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 3.7%Alexander Hall: 0.7%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect3.7%This article: 0.0%Alexander Hall: 2.8%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Hall: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.8%Alexander Hall: 1.8%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias2.8%This article: 3.9%Alexander Hall: 0.5%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect3.9%This article: 0.0%Alexander Hall: 1.1%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 5.9%Alexander Hall: 15.1%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem5.9%This article: 0.0%Alexander Hall: 2.2%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 4.1%Alexander Hall: 1.3%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority4.1%This article: 3.9%Alexander Hall: 3.6%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma3.9%This article: 0.0%Alexander Hall: 3.1%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Hall: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Hall: 12.5%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 2.8%Alexander Hall: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring2.8%This article: 0.0%Alexander Hall: 0.9%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 27.4%Alexander Hall: 17.9%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion27.4%This article: 0.0%Alexander Hall: 2.2%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 5.9%Alexander Hall: 3.3%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.9%This article: 14.0%Alexander Hall: 1.9%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque14.0%This article: 1.8%Alexander Hall: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof1.8%This article: 0.0%Alexander Hall: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Hall: 2.5%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 4.1%Alexander Hall: 2.9%Fox Nation: 2.4%Anecdotal4.1%This article: 0.0%Alexander Hall: 1.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 14.4%Alexander Hall: 4.4%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)14.4%This article: 0.0%Alexander Hall: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Hall: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Hall: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 12.8%Alexander Hall: 2.2%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading12.8%This article: 11.5%Alexander Hall: 2.1%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy11.5%This article: 0.0%Alexander Hall: 1.5%Fox Nation: 1.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Hall: 1.3%Fox Nation: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Hall: 5.4%Fox Nation: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Hall: 1.8%Fox Nation: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Hall: 1.4%Fox Nation: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Hall: 1.1%Fox Nation: 3.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.1%Alexander Hall: 0.7%Fox Nation: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…3.1%

541 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers69%attributed speech170writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageJimmy Kimmel • 38 words • 0.0% coverageJimmy Kimmel • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageJimmy Kimmel • 8 words • 0.0% coverageJimmy Kimmel • 38 words • 0.0% coverageJimmy Kimmel • 10 words • 0.0% coverageJimmy Kimmel • 16 words • 0.0% coverageJimmy Kimmel • 4 words • 0.0% coverageJimmy Kimmel • 21 words • 0.0% coverageSpencer Pratt • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageJimmy Kimmel • 15 words • 0.0% coverageJimmy Kimmel • 48 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageJimmy Kimmel • 22 words • 0.0% coverageJimmy Kimmel • 14 words • 0.0% coverageJimmy Kimmel • 32 words • 0.0% coverageJimmy Kimmel • 40 words • 0.0% coverageFox News • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Spencer Pratt

100%flagged-word coverage
36 attributed words9.7% of attributed speech66% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -10.0 ptsWriter: 10.0%Spencer Pratt: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.