Speaker summary
74% 38 analyzed articles/videos 4,547 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Spencer Pratt results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 16.2% saturation with 736.445 hits . Analysis detected 9,620.375 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,547 analyzed words across 38 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 2% (25,831 of 26,155 speakers). This Spencer Pratt is better (less manipulative) than 98.80% of the peer group. Spencer Pratt
Speaker details
Total words: 4,547
Content count: 38
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.2% percentile 3.8% BS Score38 analyzed videos4.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 0.7% 0.7% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 11.6% 11.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 16.2% 16.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 7.3% 7.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 12.9% 12.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 3.0% 3.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 6.0% 6.0% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 7.4% 7.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 16.2%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 15.9% Ad Hominem: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Begging the Question: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 0.8% In-Group Bias: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 3.1% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst