Spencer Pratt blasts Mamdani’s July 4 speech: ‘Communists always start with the bad memories’ 75%

By Kiara Moore61%

7/5/2026, 9:43:50 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Indoctrination, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 51.4% saturation with 165 hits. Analysis detected 1,053 faulty-reasoning hits from 321 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 67% and a BS Rank of 75% (5,376 of 21,172 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 74.60% of the article peer group.

Former Los Angeles mayoral candidate Spencer Pratt blasted New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s July 4th speech by saying “communists always start with the bad memories” after Mamdani marked America’s 250th anniversary of independence through the lens of New York City’s immigrant story. 
Mamdani argued that patriotism requires confronting the nation’s shortcomings. 
“Our nation marks 250 years since we declared our independence,” Mamdani said, speaking from the Governor’s Room at New York City Hall on Friday. 
“America is exceptional because here, nothing is fixed in place.” 
Pratt sharply criticized Mamdani’s appearance at George Washington’s ceremonial desk, framing the address as part of what he described as a broader ideological effort to reshape national identity. 
“We all had to sit and watch that vile commie mayor sit on the wrong side of our Founding Fathers’ desk to try and lecture us about our own history,” Pratt said in a post on X. 
Pratt argued that political movements he associates with communism rely on erasing historical memory to weaken national identity. 
“The communist must attack your history,” he said. 
“Why? 
Because history is what anchors you. 
It’s what makes us attached to something.” 
He expanded on the analogy, comparing national history to a family home built through shared experiences and memories, saying, “If you have no memories to attach you to it, it’s just wood and drywall- who cares? 
Get rid of it.” 
Pratt dismissed Mamdani’s framing of American history as exclusionary, arguing instead that national pride is essential. 
“It’s okay to love America; not only is it okay, it’s necessary,” Pratt said. 
Pratt insisted the U.S. remains defined by its historical legacy and sacrifices and concluded with a forceful defense of American exceptionalism and Independence Day traditions, saying, “Be proud of your history; show some American pride. 
Raise your plaid, raise your finger, and say, F—k you, communist.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 5.0%Kiara Moore: 2.6%Washington Examiner: 5.3%Confirmation Bias5.0%This article: 0.0%Kiara Moore: 3.5%Washington Examiner: 0.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 11.2%Kiara Moore: 1.9%Washington Examiner: 3.2%Availability Heuristic11.2%This article: 1.9%Kiara Moore: 1.8%Washington Examiner: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic1.9%This article: 0.0%Kiara Moore: 0.8%Washington Examiner: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kiara Moore: 0.0%Washington Examiner: 2.1%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 51.4%Kiara Moore: 20.1%Washington Examiner: 8.5%Framing Effect51.4%This article: 0.0%Kiara Moore: 0.0%Washington Examiner: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 15.3%Kiara Moore: 5.0%Washington Examiner: 0.6%Status Quo Bias15.3%This article: 0.0%Kiara Moore: 0.0%Washington Examiner: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kiara Moore: 0.0%Washington Examiner: 1.6%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kiara Moore: 0.0%Washington Examiner: 1.8%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 31.8%Kiara Moore: 7.5%Washington Examiner: 9.3%Negativity Bias31.8%This article: 4.4%Kiara Moore: 0.7%Washington Examiner: 1.3%Self-Serving Bias4.4%This article: 0.0%Kiara Moore: 0.8%Washington Examiner: 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Kiara Moore: 0.0%Washington Examiner: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 21.8%Kiara Moore: 12.6%Washington Examiner: 2.1%In-Group Bias21.8%This article: 11.5%Kiara Moore: 7.0%Washington Examiner: 1.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias11.5%This article: 10.9%Kiara Moore: 1.8%Washington Examiner: 2.3%Halo Effect10.9%This article: 0.0%Kiara Moore: 3.8%Washington Examiner: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kiara Moore: 0.0%Washington Examiner: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kiara Moore: 0.0%Washington Examiner: 1.7%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 4.4%Kiara Moore: 0.7%Washington Examiner: 0.5%Primacy Effect4.4%This article: 0.0%Kiara Moore: 0.0%Washington Examiner: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 11.5%Kiara Moore: 9.3%Washington Examiner: 2.3%Ad Hominem11.5%This article: 0.0%Kiara Moore: 0.8%Washington Examiner: 1.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Kiara Moore: 1.9%Washington Examiner: 3.9%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 7.5%Kiara Moore: 2.0%Washington Examiner: 3.0%False Dilemma7.5%This article: 1.2%Kiara Moore: 3.0%Washington Examiner: 1.5%Slippery Slope1.2%This article: 4.0%Kiara Moore: 0.7%Washington Examiner: 0.2%Circular Reasoning4.0%This article: 5.6%Kiara Moore: 8.2%Washington Examiner: 9.0%Hasty Generalization5.6%This article: 0.0%Kiara Moore: 0.0%Washington Examiner: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Kiara Moore: 0.0%Washington Examiner: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 45.8%Kiara Moore: 14.9%Washington Examiner: 5.9%Appeal to Emotion45.8%This article: 6.9%Kiara Moore: 1.4%Washington Examiner: 1.7%Begging the Question6.9%This article: 8.7%Kiara Moore: 2.2%Washington Examiner: 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)8.7%This article: 0.0%Kiara Moore: 0.0%Washington Examiner: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Kiara Moore: 0.0%Washington Examiner: 0.7%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Kiara Moore: 0.0%Washington Examiner: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Kiara Moore: 1.9%Washington Examiner: 0.5%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Kiara Moore: 0.0%Washington Examiner: 2.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Kiara Moore: 0.0%Washington Examiner: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 11.2%Kiara Moore: 1.9%Washington Examiner: 2.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)11.2%This article: 0.0%Kiara Moore: 0.0%Washington Examiner: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Kiara Moore: 0.0%Washington Examiner: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Kiara Moore: 0.0%Washington Examiner: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Kiara Moore: 0.0%Washington Examiner: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Kiara Moore: 0.0%Washington Examiner: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Kiara Moore: 0.0%Washington Examiner: 2.3%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 4.4%Kiara Moore: 1.4%Washington Examiner: 1.8%Quote-first Misdirection4.4%This article: 17.8%Kiara Moore: 3.6%Washington Examiner: 11.7%Biased Writer Voice17.8%This article: 34.0%Kiara Moore: 11.2%Washington Examiner: 3.5%Indoctrination34.0%This article: 0.0%Kiara Moore: 0.0%Washington Examiner: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kiara Moore: 9.4%Washington Examiner: 4.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kiara Moore: 0.0%Washington Examiner: 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

321 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers82%attributed speech57writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 43 words • 100.0% coverageZohran Mamdani • 9 words • 0.0% coverageZohran Mamdani • 24 words • 0.0% coverageZohran Mamdani • 10 words • 0.0% coverageSpencer Pratt • 28 words • 0.0% coverageSpencer Pratt • 37 words • 100.0% coverageSpencer Pratt • 18 words • 0.0% coverageSpencer Pratt • 8 words • 100.0% coverageSpencer Pratt • 1 words • 0.0% coverageSpencer Pratt • 6 words • 0.0% coverageSpencer Pratt • 7 words • 0.0% coverageSpencer Pratt • 36 words • 0.0% coverageSpencer Pratt • 4 words • 100.0% coverageSpencer Pratt • 16 words • 0.0% coverageSpencer Pratt • 14 words • 100.0% coverageSpencer Pratt • 35 words • 100.0% coverageSpencer Pratt • 11 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Spencer Pratt

100%flagged-word coverage
221 attributed words84% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-100.0 ptsWriter: 100.0%Spencer Pratt: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination+49.3 ptsWriter: 0.0%Spencer Pratt: 49.3%49.3%Quote-first Misdirection-24.6 ptsWriter: 24.6%Spencer Pratt: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.