Author summary
61% 2 analyzed articles/videos 539 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kiara Moore results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , In-Group Bias , and Indoctrination , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 20.1% saturation with 390 hits . Analysis detected 2,796 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,938 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of 81% (1,211 of 6,263 authors). This Kiara Moore is worse (more manipulative) than 80.70% of the peer group. Kiara Moore
Author details
Total words: 1,938
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
81% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 80.7% percentile 4.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.5% 7.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 11.3% 11.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 9.4% 9.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 9.3% 9.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 20.1% 20.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 12.6% 12.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 20.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 14.9%, sitewide 15.9% In-Group Bias: Author 12.6%, sitewide 6.9% Indoctrination: Author 11.3%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 9.4%, sitewide 1.4% Ad Hominem: Author 9.3%, sitewide 2.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 3.1% Halo Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.6%, sitewide 5.3% Status Quo Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 4.0% Horn Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Slippery Slope: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst