Author summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,076 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tom Murray results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 17.5% saturation with 1,097 hits. Analysis detected 8,851 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,268 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 67% (2,240 of 6,628 authors). This Tom Murray is worse (more manipulative) than 66.20% of the peer group.
Tom Murray
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
67%Tom Murray (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,268
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

66% percentile
025507510066.2% percentile
3.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.1%8.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 17.5%17.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.4%3.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.4%3.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.0%2.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.6%0.6%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 7.1%7.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 9.7%9.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 16.7%, sitewide 19.2%Ad Hominem: Author 17.5%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 13.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.7%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 7.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 2.0%In-Group Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 4.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.1%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate