Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video476 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Taylor Herzlich results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 23.9% saturation with 456 hits. Analysis detected 3,295 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,904 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.6% and a BS Rank of 86% (907 of 6,348 authors). This Taylor Herzlich is worse (more manipulative) than 85.70% of the peer group.
Taylor Herzlich
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
86%Taylor Herzlich (selected)6%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,904
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

86% percentile
025507510085.7% percentile
5.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 14.4%14.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 5.3%5.3%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 5.5%5.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 11.9%11.9%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 6.1%6.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 11.2%11.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 3.4%3.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 10.2%10.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 22.4%22.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 23.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 22.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.9%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 14.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 11.2%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Author 10.2%, sitewide 6.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 7.3%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Author 6.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.2%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Author 5.3%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.1%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.0%Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Primacy Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos