Speaker summary
50% 49 analyzed articles/videos 636 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Israel results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Self-Serving Bias , and Fundamental Attribution Error , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 161 hits . Analysis detected 1,344.157 faulty-reasoning hits from 636 analyzed words across 49 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 2% (27,798 of 28,364 speakers). This Israel is better (less manipulative) than 98.00% of the peer group. Israel
Speaker details
Total words: 636
Article count: 49
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.0% percentile 4.5% BS Score49 analyzed videos636 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 11.4% 11.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 4.2% 4.2% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 13.0% 13.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 10.2% 10.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 10.2% 10.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 2.6% 2.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 12.2% 12.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 11.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Begging the Question: Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 1.7% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 11.1% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 3.7% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 2.7% Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 0.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% No True Scotsman: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst