Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Corey Walker results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.5% saturation with 583 hits. Analysis detected 3,790 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,715 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,207 authors). This Corey Walker is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Corey Walker
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Corey Walker (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 2,715
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 11.9%11.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.1%2.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 13.3%13.3%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 7.6%7.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 7.6%7.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 9.4%9.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 3.7%3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 13.1%13.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 4.3%4.3%No True ScotsmanSitewide 0.1%Author 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 11.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 21.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 13.1%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 13.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 9.7%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Author 9.4%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 3.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.9%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.0%Recency Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%No True Scotsman: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.1%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos