Publication summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Algemeiner.com results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.5% saturation with 583 hits. Analysis detected 3,790 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,715 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 398 publications). This Algemeiner.com is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Algemeiner.com
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
0%WSB-TV Channel 2 - Atlanta1%
1%Brookings1%
1%The Banner1%
1%FactCheck.org1%
1%@politifact1%
99%Utah Hockey Club13%
100%MS NOW Insights Community23%
100%MS NOW Live Events26%
100%www.globalsecurity.org30%
100%NBC 6 South Florida33%
0%Algemeiner.com (selected)0%
Publication details
Total words: 2,715
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed publications

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

PublicationSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Publication 11.9%11.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Publication 2.1%2.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Publication 13.3%13.3%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Publication 7.6%7.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Publication 7.6%7.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Publication 9.4%9.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Publication 3.7%3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Publication 13.1%13.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Publication 4.3%4.3%No True ScotsmanSitewide 0.1%Publication 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Publication 11.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Publication 21.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Publication 13.1%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Publication 13.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Publication 9.7%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Publication 9.4%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 7.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 7.6%, sitewide 3.1%Confirmation Bias: Publication 7.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Publication 4.3%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 3.7%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 2.0%Recency Bias: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%No True Scotsman: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 0.1%Unattributed Quote: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide ratePublication rate

Analyzed articles and videos